🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a challenging path since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks reopen.

The American leader last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He asserted the attacks started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Solution

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had always sought to impose their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and remains the primary answer to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the equivalent language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this invasion."